<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moock on ActionScript 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/</link>
	<description>web development goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:31:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>I think Threads and iterators are much needed things in ActionScript Looking forward for these changes..  which can make our apps..  more fast..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Threads and iterators are much needed things in ActionScript Looking forward for these changes..  which can make our apps..  more fast..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>What about full generic type support? (MyType) Or bytecode generation for AOP support? I think Adobe&#039;s missing some important things that they left out of AS3. 

Where can I sign up to get on the AS4 board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about full generic type support? (MyType) Or bytecode generation for AOP support? I think Adobe&#8217;s missing some important things that they left out of AS3. </p>
<p>Where can I sign up to get on the AS4 board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-1348</guid>
		<description>Great changes for developers, but these continuing changes are going to evermore alienate Designers.

I think Adobe needs to work on an Actionscript Basic language for beginners and intermediate Flash users who don&#039;t need to learn full-blown programming, but can use it and benefit from the newer VMs and AS3/4 components.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great changes for developers, but these continuing changes are going to evermore alienate Designers.</p>
<p>I think Adobe needs to work on an Actionscript Basic language for beginners and intermediate Flash users who don&#8217;t need to learn full-blown programming, but can use it and benefit from the newer VMs and AS3/4 components.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdobeHitler</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>AdobeHitler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>It is terrible, The velocity is fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is terrible, The velocity is fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECMAScript 4 Milestone 2 Released &#171; outaTiME</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>ECMAScript 4 Milestone 2 Released &#171; outaTiME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>[...] Tucker has posted about Colin Moock and his new lecture notes on the language changes that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tucker has posted about Colin Moock and his new lecture notes on the language changes that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javascript News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ECMAScript 4 Milestone 2 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Javascript News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ECMAScript 4 Milestone 2 Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-915</guid>
		<description>[...] Tucker has posted about Colin Moock and his new lecture notes on the language changes that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tucker has posted about Colin Moock and his new lecture notes on the language changes that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlado</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-909</guid>
		<description>@Dave - you have the next best thing - cooperative multitasking, aka generators. Yeah, requires more choreography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave &#8211; you have the next best thing &#8211; cooperative multitasking, aka generators. Yeah, requires more choreography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>@Metal - ActionScript is very closely tied to ECMAScript.  Part of the reason for the excitement on his talk at FITC is that many of these features will indeed be on the drawing board for AS4.  There isn&#039;t anything solid yet, but it is certainly something for the community to look at and consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Metal &#8211; ActionScript is very closely tied to ECMAScript.  Part of the reason for the excitement on his talk at FITC is that many of these features will indeed be on the drawing board for AS4.  There isn&#8217;t anything solid yet, but it is certainly something for the community to look at and consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metal</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Metal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you should call it &quot;ActionScript 4&quot; yet. It doesn&#039;t look like Moock himself is using that term either.
As exciting as this EcmaScript 4 stuff is, I don&#039;t know if anybody can say yet when it will be integrated into Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you should call it &#8220;ActionScript 4&#8243; yet. It doesn&#8217;t look like Moock himself is using that term either.<br />
As exciting as this EcmaScript 4 stuff is, I don&#8217;t know if anybody can say yet when it will be integrated into Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tucker - Web Development Goodness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ActionScript 4 and 5 Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tucker - Web Development Goodness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ActionScript 4 and 5 Wishlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidtucker.net/2008/02/16/moock-on-actionscript-4/#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] bit of discussion has developed from my previous article, Moock on ActionScript 4 about features that people would like to see in future versions of ActionScript. Obviously at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit of discussion has developed from my previous article, Moock on ActionScript 4 about features that people would like to see in future versions of ActionScript. Obviously at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
