ActionScript 4 and 5 Wishlist

February 16th, 2008

A bit of discussion has developed from my previous article, Moock on ActionScript 4 about features that people would like to see in future versions of ActionScript. Obviously at the top of the list (mentioned by Dave) we have Threads. Does anyone have other things you want to see in the next versions of ActionScript?

Flash, Flex | Comments | Trackback | Del.icio.us | Digg | Technorati Jump to the top of this page

14 comments on “ActionScript 4 and 5 Wishlist”

  1. 01

    I don’t want to be the only contributor to this list, but non-public class constructors would be nice as well.

    Dave at February 16th, 2008 around 7:48 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  2. 02

    I agree. As much as I know some people will disagree: I would also like to see abstract classes.

    David Tucker at February 16th, 2008 around 7:49 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  3. 03

    Typed Arrays..

    Claus Wahlers at February 16th, 2008 around 8:12 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  4. 04

    @Claus - It appears that if that part of ECMAScript 4 makes it way into ActionScript 4 - you will get your wish.

    David Tucker at February 16th, 2008 around 8:14 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  5. 05

    have a look at generics in C# and how C# handle nulls now in primitive datatypes.

    barry.b at February 17th, 2008 around 4:41 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  6. 06

    One of the things I miss the most from C++ is method and constructor overloading.

    Nick Kwiatkowski at February 17th, 2008 around 7:01 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  7. 07

    @Nick - It appears that if elements of ECMAScript 4 get adopted for ActionScript 4 we will have method overloading.

    David Tucker at February 17th, 2008 around 7:25 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  8. 08

    private constructors
    operator overloading
    typed arrays
    proper XPath support!

    Luke at February 17th, 2008 around 2:01 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  9. 09

    Enums

    Phil Douglas at February 17th, 2008 around 3:30 pm
    Jump to the top of this page
  10. 10

    Threading

    Elango at February 23rd, 2008 around 3:54 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  11. 11

    Built in support for manipulating audio at the byte/sample level ;)

    Alan Queen at February 23rd, 2008 around 8:50 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  12. 12

    yeah i second that elango, the sound api needs some work… looks like we gonna get a byte datatype though… (could be a start?)

    ryan at March 4th, 2008 around 9:15 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  13. 13

    well,let me think, besides some others’ requirements, plus some more :
    1.eval function return. it’s still very usefull.
    2.static statement block.
    3.size much more smaller.
    4.performance improve, not only the graphic, also get data from server side.
    5.destruction funtion.
    6.gc..

    cimmicola at May 16th, 2008 around 2:39 am
    Jump to the top of this page
  14. 14

    nullable types for primitive datatypes, for representing null value in database, like int? construct in C#.

    hackee at July 22nd, 2008 around 7:31 am
    Jump to the top of this page

Leave a Reply

  •  
  •  
  •  

You can keep track of new comments to this post with the comments feed.

Badges

View David Tucker's profile on LinkedIn
Inside RIA Badge

Community Posts